Wednesday, April 13, 2011 - 3:07 PM

The George Soros-backed Institute for New Economic Thinking's just-concluded Bretton Woods weekend conference of leading economists didn't actually focus on America's future, but the sum of the discussions produced a pretty grim outlook.
The current political and cultural polarization of the country was seen as probably worse today than at any time since the outbreak of the Civil War exactly 150 years ago. The geography of this polarization is also similar to that of the Civil War period and the issue of a powerful federal government versus states' rights remains pretty much the same.
The polarization today is being propagated by wealthy and powerful elements on Wall Street and elsewhere that fund bitter, attack dog politics and sharply polarized media commentary.
The power of big financial and corporate lobbies is such that they overwhelm reform efforts with huge lobbying campaigns. The effort to regulate the banks and establish accountability for them has failed to a large extent. The Dodd/Frank law that is supposed to re-regulate the banks fails badly because the reform of the banks to date has involved actually making them bigger and fewer. The biggest 50-odd institutions are being designated as too big too fail, but are not being subjected to any rigorous or vigorous oversight and regulation.
By dint of being understood to be too big to fail these banks are effectively in a position to "short" the government, meaning that they can essentially force the government to subsidize them by pursuing risky investment policies that the government must then support. The cost of capital of the big boys is lower than that of the medium and smaller fry by reason of the "too big to fail" designation. Thus, they will eventually squeeze the other banks out of the game. So bye bye community banking and ever getting to a real person at the end of the endless telephone menus.
But it gets worse. Americans are far too indebted and are trying to repair their personal balance sheets and cutting consumption to pay down debt. But this is retarding recovery and forcing the government to spend more in order to keep some kind of growth going and unemployment falling. To avoid falling back into recession, the government spending will have to continue for quite some time. But this will exacerbate the U.S. trade and current account deficits and increase overseas dollar holdings.
The rest of the world is pretty strongly dedicated to export-led growth. The Germans are forcing the rest of Europe to deflate and the only way for Europe to get any growth is through exports. China says it wants to rebalance its trade and focus more on domestic consumption led growth. It's nice that China wants to do this, but it will be extremely difficult if not impossible in practice for China actually to reverse its export led policies.
The result is likely to be a continued shift of the production of tradable goods and the provision of tradable services outside of the United States to off-shore locations.
These trends will see a continued erosion of America's ability to provide a good, middle class standard of living at home and to extend security abroad.
The really smart people have already put their wealth in gold bars and moved to New Zealand.
JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images
"The really smart people have already put their wealth in gold bars and moved to New Zealand."
No, you mean the really rich people who are the exact same ones that are undermining the United States are putting their money into gold and moving to New Zealand.
This is what is so extremely perverse. What is actually going on right now is that the super rich are actively perusing the financial destruction of America for personal profit, and as has been the case in the corporate world for the last 20 years, they have created (literally in this case) golden parachutes for themselves.
They are going to do what George Soros did back in 1992 when he "broke the Bank of England", but multiplied by 1,000 or more. We aren't talking about a billion dollar theft here, we are talking about multiple trillions of dollars.
This is an extremely serious situation that 99.9% of the people just don't grasp, or actually, that may not be true, I think that a lot of average people do grasp it, its that the corporate media won't cover the issue because of course, they are owned by the very people at the heart of the problem.
I agree, but I would add that at this point I have more faith in military men than the 'elected' officials who are looking out for the interests of the super elite and others who funded their elections than the people they claim to represent. Vast majority of countries have at one point or another had a military takeover of the government, sometimes it has worked for the better other times for the worst. The US is the only large exception to this rule... so far.
Fortunately for the 99.9% average unwashed masses, there are the 0.1% intellectually superior, such as yourself, to guide humanity through the darkness. Bravo man - I say bravo! You are the center of my universe.
>sniff sniff<
In fairness George Soros was only one of the beneficiaries of the assault on the pound sterling. He had the courage to put his hand up and say so - but international banks who looted huge sums from the UK on Black Wednesday kept their heads down. At root, many US financial institutions profited hugely from the demise of IMF discipline in 1971.
Moreover around 50 of such banks in the US now have their debts guaranteed by taxpayers there? These banks may go bust, but not before the US does. What an insurance package to negotiate with public representatives; pity that 'private' talent can't negotiate for the West at the G20.
Cause of Civil War & "Too Big To Fail"
This otherwise very interesting and timely piece perpetuates the myth that "states' rights" were the cause of the Civil War. The only "states' right" in question in the Civil War was the purported right of a state to allow some of its residents to claim chattal ownership rights over other of its inhabitants. Any other explanation represents an after the fact attempt to provide a less morally reprehensible justification for what was, in reality, treason.
Any bank that is "Too Big to Fail" (which really means "Too Big To Be Allowed To Fail") should instead be thought of as "Too Big To Be Allowed To Exist." The systemic and societal risk associated with "Too Big To Fail" is simply too great.
"Any bank that is 'Too Big to Fail' (which really means 'Too Big To Be Allowed To Fail') should instead be thought of as 'Too Big To Be Allowed To Exist.'"
Good point. Too big, and too risky to be entrusted to the private sector may be the case. Not that I know the positive or negative implications, but sometimes I think our oil companies have become quite massive and overpowered as well (taking government subsidies, while recording record profits? Interesting...). I will say that private companies becoming more powerful (or more manipulative) than the government that is supposed to regulate them is frightening.
Interesting that George Soros would be complaining about rich people pumping money into polarizing the country.
Hang on just a moment,, I'm an American that moved to NZ 12 years ago, and I think there are some things you need to know. The debt level person is in excess of $46,000 for government debt . This government is borrowing 365 Million a week to keep it afloat. Many businesses are leaving NZ for Mexico and China. The economic balance of this country is based on paying nearly a 5% dividend on common deposits , which is the highest in the world right now. Once the economic community realizes the weakness of the economic situation of NZ or the government defaults on borrowed money that it can't afford then the exchange rate will plummet. Right now the exchange rate is at a nearly 30 year high, based on the 5% banking deposit issue. Taxes are un-real gas price is over $6 USD a gallon. Social entitlements and immigration for UN refugees is an over burden to the social medicine system which is failing to meet its own standards. Yep the mountains and ocean are nice to look at but with the Green's shoving it down your throat , and limiting every thing you do I hardly see NZ as a better option than the US .
Clyde Prestowitz is the president of the Economic Strategy Institute and writes on the global economy for FP.
Read More
(8)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE