Posted By Clyde Prestowitz Share

For many years it has been the conventional wisdom that the U.S. economy is the world's most dynamic with the world's most flexible work force, most entrepreneurial ethic, most new start-ups, and most innovative management and with the most benefits from globalization. Declinism was not only out of vogue. It had an air of illegitimacy about it. Now, suddenly, declinism is in fashion and it is the conventional wisdom that America is headed in the wrong direction on the wrong track.

A new conventional wisdom is evolving to explain the causes of the decline and how to address them. Among the key elements of this new orthodoxy are the notions that the U.S. is lagging badly in innovation and education. This diagnosis, of course, leads directly to prescriptions for greater spending on and government support of R&D and much greater emphasis on getting students not only into and out of college but into advanced and professional degrees.

Of course, it is true that U.S. spending on R&D as a percent of GDP has fallen and stagnated in comparison with the glory days of yesteryear and the recent reports on SAT scores certainly seem to confirm that there are problems with U.S. education. And yet, as I consider Germany, I wonder.

Germany has higher wages, higher taxes, higher welfare costs, a lower percentage of college and professional graduates, and lower spending as a percent of GDP on R&D than the United States. Yet, in contrast to America's chronically large trade deficit and high unemployment rate, Germany has a huge trade surplus and a low unemployment rate. What's going on?

One thing is a misperception about high tech, R&D, and innovation. Consider a recent conversation I had with a CEO of an American office furniture manufacturer. Just making small talk at a conference, I asked him how business was. " Pretty good," he said. "What's selling?" I asked. "We have a line of Cherry office furniture that's just flying out of the showroom," he replied. "Where do you make it," I asked. "Well," he said, "we cut the cherry trees in West Virginia. They have the best cherry trees in West Virginia. Then we ship the logs to Germany where they peel the veneer. Then we ship the veneer to China where it is glued to the frame and then they ship the finished furniture to us in Wisconsin where we market and sell it." Astonished, I asked in a tone of disbelief, "You ship the logs to Germany? Is there no one who can peel veneer in America?" "Yes," he admitted, but went on to emphasize that "the Germans do it far better than the Americans."

Veneer peeling never shows up on the lists of high-tech industries and is never discussed when there is talk of the need for more Silicon Valley style start-ups and innovation. Nor do veneer peelers need advanced college degrees. Yet veneer peeling in Germany is so high-tech and so innovative that furniture makers are shipping logs and veneer around the world to get something done in Germany that one would expect to be easily done in the United States. Innovation and high tech doesn't have to be Google or Silicon Valley. It may not necessarily take a lot of basic Research spending (although certainly some D spending) or advanced formal education.

What Germany has is a lot of family owned, medium sized businesses and a government and society that are committed to the long term and to keeping German-based production competitive in as many sectors as possible. It also has a system of training and maintaining skills that doesn't turn out PhDs, but does turn out supremely qualified workers. And, of course, to gain full advantage from those skills, it strives through cooperation between industry, government, and labor to keep producers competitive from a German production base.

Of course, I do not mean to oppose further support of education and R&D in the United States. The more the better. But perhaps we should also try to learn from the Germans.

Johannes Simon/Getty Images

EXPLORE:FLASH POINTS
 

WILL TURNER

7:24 PM ET

September 21, 2011

Skills to Pay the Bills

What I think a lot of folks are missing is that it's job training, not "education" that ultimately makes workers and the industries they support competitive. Sure going to college provides academic skills and a knowledge base from which to grow once one eventually enters the workforce, but it still takes time to learn the specific skills of any new job, regardless of formal education.

We usually provide two main options in this country: 1) get a college degree and beyond 2) try to make it with a high school diploma. I came from a rural area where not everyone has the ability, money, or interests to attend college, but were hard working and very smart with their hands. We should provide these workers with a third path of technical training to be competitive in a variety of careers outside the traditional academic path. Many are builders and mechanics that have no interest in a liberal arts education. They, like those Germans, just want the skills to pay their bills.

This requires local government officials to do their jobs identifying and promoting industries their region can be competitive in. They need to help make the region attractive to the types of businesses they want to invest and hire there. This includes, among many other things, a workforce with targeted skills. Business investors literally have a world of options. Communities have to think strategically about what they can bring to the table.

 

HEALTH007

3:35 PM ET

September 26, 2011

What is the hottest electronic cigarette?

What is the hottest electronic cigarette? The answer containF1(ego-W).
health007.net

 

BARBARAAR

3:02 AM ET

September 22, 2011

This is all true but

Here are a few quotes...
China offers, free electricity and water, long tax holidays and virtually free labor...Thanks!
Ar Condicionado Imoveis Acompanhantes Casas de Massagem

 

DILBERT

8:27 AM ET

September 22, 2011

Unfortunately economics doesn't work that way

Once a Chinese businessman decides he wants to buy the same veneer peeling equipment (probably made in Germany for now), and sets up a veneer peeling plant next to the veneer gluing plant, the American manufacturer will ship the logs directly to China for peeling and gluing - bypassing Germany to get a better price with the same quality (hint: the machine that peels the logs are totally automatic - not a lot of training needed to push a button).

The next stage of the economic evolution is for the Chinese businessman to notice that China has plenty of cherry trees (China is famous for it's exquisite cherry wood fine furniture) and then it's game over for the guys in Virginia as well.

This process will continue until wages and cost of living in China rise to the point where the Americans start paying the next low-wage country to do the work.

Bottom line: if you want to compete on price, you'll have to compete on wages (given that everyone uses the same technology). The only way for the US to get an advantage is to create the next new technology the everyone needs, but only exists in the US of A.

 

DILBERT

10:10 AM ET

September 22, 2011

...and that new technology doesn't grow on trees

It grows in well funded R&D labs where world class university graduates work on world class problems.

If the USA doesn't want to compete with the rest of world working on the "next big science and technology thing", then they will eventually find themselves competing with Bangladesh or Niger for textile manufacturing jobs.

 

RADUKOR

10:38 AM ET

September 22, 2011

peeling

I am not an economist, but I’ve spent some time for my technical education and training in Asia, Scandinavia, UK, Germany and Swiss and I can compare the pros and cons of each.
1. The economic systems in Germany/Scandinavia/Swiss are based on the same educational model: at 14-16 years old, not 18 like in UK/US, you have to decide whether you will follow a formal education (with university and the rest) or if you want to learn a trade in a technical school. Therefore at 18 you are already prepared to be hired in a manufacturing job while in UK and in US you have to wait until 18 to make this decision. It is this medium layer of economy, not the high-tech R&D which provides the backbone of export and employment, and this is a stable system that absorbs all the shocks in the global trade that affects the high-tech.
2. The other factor that makes this model is the institutional aversion for outsourcing. In UK young teens have no chance in learning any trade besides football, X-factoring and banking because almost ALL manufacturing companies were sent abroad by the banks and their clients in government. And this aversion is just an expression of patriotism.
3. The consumers in Scandinavia and Swiss prefer their own products even if they are more expensive that those from abroad. Ergo patriotism.
4. So basically is a culture issue defined by what you consider to be important before being a legal one.

 

STRYKERCAVSCOUT

12:15 PM ET

September 22, 2011

With Point 1

The problem is amplified because at 18 you have been forced through a program which has as its only goal getting you into college. If you aren't interested or able - then you're probably frustrated and/or poorly positioned.

I'm strongly in favor of a tracking system that starts out fairly early and gets kids moving to where they want to go earlier - and helps direct those having difficulty making the right decision for themselves. We need to start treating education in this country as a common good instead of a local one.

Educating our children provides for our future as adults just as much as it does for their future - they're the ones who will be running the show when we're old.

 

MATTW0699

2:06 PM ET

September 22, 2011

Schooling is a big problem

"It also has a system of training and maintaining skills that doesn't turn out PhDs, but does turn out supremely qualified workers."

Good point. Our schooling system is massively misallocating resources. Student loans for all is creating a schooling cost bubble and putting our students into big time debt by the time they graduate. Let's eliminate government sponsored student loans and pop the bubble. Most kids should not be going to college anyway.

 

KUNINO

8:56 PM ET

September 22, 2011

Geography lessons

Go to the mall, buy a leading US brand name dress shirt, read the geography lesson on the label inside the collar. A few generations ago, the US fabric factories moved to the sun belt for the cheaper non-union factory workers there. Now similar principles have moved it further down, well outside the national borders.

It could well be that what the world most wants from the US is soybeans. In my travels I have come across a leading Taiwanese computer hardware innovator that ascribed part of its success to having what it called "a brain farm" in the United States. Americans could come up with excellent ideas in the homeland but there was no point in having them fabricated nearby. And I see that rich foreigners who want to splash out their achievement are much less likely than a dozen years ago to display it with an expensive American automobile -- the badge of success in former times.

As to soybeans, it's only a few years since midwest crop farmers were threatened with jail if they chose to sell their beans to Cuba. A nation governed on the principle of starve the commie bastards and American farmers alike would not seem among the forefront of human and technical endeavor..

 

DR. SARDONICUS

1:04 AM ET

September 23, 2011

Fix it from the top down, not the bottom up

How wonderful it is to hear all these college grads (or more advanced degrees) agree that the college-educated middle class should be degraded into a high school-shop-trained underclass waiting for jobs to appear (or not) at the pay rates of 2011 inland China.

Most high-tech first appears out of the garages of the middle class, at the instigation of hobby enthusiasts and dropout youths. The larger the middle class, the more of these off-the-radar innovations appear and the more the rest of the population could benefit from them via new wealth, environmental restoration and new kinds of work.

On the other hand, the more generously funded the research institute, the likelier it will be to reject truly innovative thinking and/or technology. The wealthy have too much interest is maintaining the status quo and its heat-death technologies. The real problem is trying to get the powers that be to accept new high tech from unexpected sources, at the expense of their obsolete “burn it and radiate it” cash cows.

Try tackling that problem, instead of your no-brainer, neo-aristocratic appeals for medieval craft guilds without any of its traditional protections that took long, painful centuries to evolve.

 

TCOLGAN001

2:05 PM ET

September 26, 2011

America’s problem - Bad Government and Corporate Welfare

Thanks for publishing this article Clyde.

I get so nauseated every time I hear/read people stating that we just need to study more, work harder, pollute more and expect less in order to compete in the “New Global Economy”. What we need is to cut the umbilical cord between the US government and their political financiers who are profiting from American indebtedness. Regain a connection to the people so that the government is motivated to act in the interests of the commonwealth.

 

LORRAINE CONNETT

6:12 PM ET

October 20, 2011

Earlier I would have believed

Earlier I would have believed so. But now they have the technique to get the technique. They have the sources. The real art still lies in the east.

LPNTrainingPrograms
Medical_ Assistant_Certification

 

Clyde Prestowitz is the president of the Economic Strategy Institute and writes on the global economy for FP.

Read More